Differences between girl on the train book and movie
Girl on the Train: 5 Differences Between the Book and Movie | Phoenix New TimesSometimes that old saying is right - and the book is just better than the film in every single way. As many fans of Paula Hawkins' The Girl on the Train soon discovered, packing into cinemas to watch the glitzy Hollywood adaptation of what's been invariably described as the next Gone Girl , many were in for something of an unpleasant surprise. Indeed, The Independent 's Geoffrey Macnab described the film as a " jolting and confusing ride ", and book fans are quickly discovering that even Emily Blunt's always stellar work fails to save this cinematic adaptation from becoming a mere shadow of its source material. And let's not even start with the fact that, despite its British star, the film switches up the book's London's setting for New York; without any apparent good reason to do so. Hawkins herself has agreed with critics that Blunt's casting sees her as " too beautiful " to realistically play the self-destructive Rachel, whose character is an overweight alcoholic. You can find our Community Guidelines in full here. Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists?
REVIEW: GIRL ON THE TRAIN #BUTTONSBOOKSHELF - Everyday Estée
The 5 biggest 'Girl on the Train' book to movie changes
Don't have an account yet? Get the most out of your experience with a personalized all-access pass to everything local on events, music, restaurants, news and more. Get off at this stop if you want to avoid the surprises. Millions of copies were sold of the psychological thriller, riding closely and furiously on the wave of another successful whodunnit "girl" book, Gone Girl. It was only a matter of time before it made its way to the big screen, bringing a very complicated narrative style to life. The story is seen primarily through the eyes of a woman named Rachel, a down-on-her-luck alcoholic, the kind of female anti-hero who doesn't always get portrayed on screen. However, Emily Blunt Sicario, The Devil Wears Prada managed to capture the hot mess-ness beautifully, making you equal parts uncomfortable and sympathetic for our not-quite-heroine.
For instance, instead of taking place in the drab suburbs of London, the film takes place in the slightly glossier suburbs of New York City — a decision that was made for thematic as well as financial reasons. But, as in every screen adaptation, the movie also departs from the narrative tracks laid down by the original in countless other subtle ways. Well, not countless ways. Spoilers for The Girl on the Train below! Movie: Rachel is a sad and lonely alcoholic who drinks vodka out of a water bottle. Movie: Cathy is played by Laura Prepon, which automatically makes her 30 percent cooler. After the revelations at the end of the film, this scene makes no sense.
The same night that Rachel stumbles off the train to drunkenly confront her ex, the wife goes missing, leading Rachel to question her possible involvement. You have been warned. This is the first, most obvious change. Despite the change in location, the Westchester area of New York looks every bit as upper-class-suburban as described in the novel. Her eyeliner is a bit cakey and her eyes are bloodshot from day-drinking through her lonely existence, but mostly she just looks like Blunt after a long night and a tough breakup. As described by Hawkins, the book version of Rachel has put on a bit of weight due to her drinking and depression, and often appears disheveled with stains on her clothes. As it stands, Movie Rachel is hardly the portrait of alcoholism.